Newsletter Special October 2008
we said that council tax payers should not be called upon to bail out local authorities
who lose money invested in the Icelandic Banks. Local authorities were warned by
the Chancellor in September 2007 to be more cautious and not rely on rankings by credit
reference agencies. However, some did not follow this warning and as a result,
have lost, at present, some of their reserves and/or pension funds. These reserves
are monies received either from Government, local fees and charges or the council tax
payer. So called "experts" said that the council tax payer will have to make good
any losses. We strongly disagree.
On the 25 November 2008 Local Government Minister John Healey said in a written update that "As a result of our assessment exercise, I am now satisfied that none of the 104 English councils who said to the LGA that they had investments in Icelandic banks are facing severe short-term difficulties as a result of the failure of the banks. However, we will continue to work closely with the LGA to monitor the situation; and we stand ready to fund further financial expert support for authorities who need it."
The full update can be accessed from the 'Icelandic Banks - Support for local authorities' link below.
The good news is that it does seem that at least 90% of the money will be returned, possibly more. With regards to the remaining 10%, we will keep tracking this and should councils try to charge this to the council tax payer, then we will raise this directly with the Government. Our position is that no council tax payer should be double charged for the mistakes of local councils.
The District Auditor to North East Lincolnshire Council has issued a public interest
report on the Council's investments in Icelandic banks. It identifies significant
shortcomings in how the Council managed investments in 2008 - and concludes that it failed
to protect the interests of taxpayers.
The report says that effective financial control systems were not in operation and senior Council officers did not adhere to the Council's Annual Investment Strategy. If controls had been in place, and professional advice received had been acted on, then the Icelandic investments would not have been made by the Council during 2008. As well as examining in detail how the Council managed these investments, including controls, compliance arrangements and professional practice, the public interest report comments on the Council's own internal investigations, which included disciplinary processes.
Click on the link to read the report. North East Lincolnshire Council - Icelandic investments
Please refer to our
and read the paragraph regarding the use of hyperlinks on this website.
All links open in a new window.
Copyright © 2009 Isitfair.co.uk Site Design: www.net77.co.uk